Klardenker Esslingen a. N.

In den letzten Tagen gab es offenbar einige Wohnungsdurchsuchungen und Repressalien bei diversen Internet-Schreibern. Hier nur eine kurze Zusammenfassung mit den Links zum jeweiligen Originalartikel:

1. Durchsuchung und Beschlagnahmung bei Wake News Radio (Bericht von Seelenkrieger).
2. Webseitensperrung bei Seelenkrieger.org (Eigenbericht von Seelenkrieger).
3. Hausdurchsuchung bei dem Honigmann, angeblich wegen Holocaustleugnung (Eigenbericht von Honigmann, ohne jeden Beleg, auch auf mehrfache Anfrage keine Belege)
4. Und ständig Hausdurchsuchungen und Einbrüche bei den staatlichen Selbstverwaltungen, aber das ist ja nichts Neues und kein Wunder (Staseve Bericht).

Der erste nicht-satirische Film von Alexander Lehmann. Dieser wurde übrigens für die Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung erstellt, die den Film offenbar schon wieder von ihrer Webseite entfernt hat.

Der Film ist bei einem Workshop für die Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung entstanden. Zusammen mit 5 Studenten sollte ein Film zum Thema “10 Jahre 9/11″ innerhalb von 3 Tagen entstehen. Wir haben uns recht schnell auf einen Teilaspekt dieses riesigen Feldes einigen können. Wir wollten unser Hauptaugenmerk auf die Reaktion einer Gesellschaft auf einen Anschlag legen. In den drei Tagen haben wir dann zusammen die Idee, das Konzept, den Text und das Storyboard erarbeitet. Ich habe dann in den folgenden Tagen den Film animiert. Es ist das erste mal, dass ich einen “Nicht-Satirischen-Film” zu einem politischen Thema gemacht habe.

Quelle: RetteDeineFreiheit Blog.

DemocracyNow.org – Democracy Now! broadcasts from Chicago, site of the largest NATO summit in the organization’s six-decade history. On Sunday, veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, as well as members of Afghans For Peace, led a peace march of thousands of people. Iraq Veterans Against the War held a ceremony where nearly 50 veterans discarded their war medals by hurling them down the street in the direction of the NATO summit. We hear the soldiers’ voices as they return their medals one by one from the stage. “I am giving back my global war on terror service medal in solidarity with the people of Iraq and Afghanistan,” said Jason Heard, a former combat medic who spent 10 years in the U.S. Army. “I am deeply sorry for the destruction that we have caused in these countries and around the globe.”

To watch the complete daily, independent news hour, read the transcript, download the podcast, and for more information, visit Democracy Now.

Democracy Now | Website | Facebook | Twitter | Youtube | SoundCloud | Daily Email News Digest

Ein Vortrag von Peter Fitzek vom 26. März 2011.

Es gibt drei Wege der Erkenntnis:

1. Die Nachahmung (das ist der leichteste)
2. Das Nachdenken (das ist der edelste)
3. Die Erfahrung (das ist der bitterste)

Anlässlich des Pendragon Kongress am 26. März 2011 in Gedern, hielt Peter Fitzek einen Vortrag zum Thema: “Neue Wege für Mensch und Gesellschaft. Grundlagen eines neuen Finanz- und Wirtschaftssystems, eine Alternative zum Krankenversicherungssystem und Staatskonzept eines fortschrittlichen Staates im Dienst an seinen Bürgern”. Aufgrund des Umfangs wurde das Video in drei Teile geteilt.. Weitere interessante Nachrichten und Informationen finden sie unter: www.extremnews.com

Der Begründer von NeuDeutschland und Vordenker und Praktiker in Sachen staatlicher Neuausrichtung des Lands, Peter Fitzek, im Gespräch mit Michael Vogt über seine Revolution im Lande und auf leisen Sohlen zum Neustart Deutschlands.

Peter Fitzek, der inzwischen ein eigenes System mit Krankenkassen und Renten- und Sozialversicherung aufgebaut hat und dessen offizielle Anerkennung einem untergehenden Staatswesen in einem mühsamen und jahrelangen Kampf abtrotzen konnte, wird mit Juni den nächsten, revolutionären Schritt gehen:

• Gründung eines neuen Staat in Deutschland, der allen Menschen dient.
• Staat und dessen Aufgaben werden neu definiert.
• Es wird eine neue Staatsform geben.
• Der neue Staat wird sich neuer Systeme bedienen.
• Dieser Staat kommt ohne Steuer- und Kotrollsysteme aus.
• Dieser neue Staat in Deutschland wird sich Zug um Zug auf ganz Deutschland ausweiten.
• Schon heute gibt es erste internationale Beziehungen zu anderen Staaten.
• Eine besondere Bedeutung kommt (und kam in der Vergangenheit) den Siegermächten des 2. Weltkrieges und bei der Neugründung insbesondere Rußland zu.
• Der neue Staat wird sich (erstmals) aktiv der Frage zuwenden, wann es Zeit ist, sich (nach fast sieben Jahrzehnten) um einen Friedensvertrag zu kümmern.

Stichtag: 16. und 17. Juni in Wittenberg

NeuDeutschland | Webseite | Youtube | Twitter | NDGK | NDRK | Kooperationskasse | EngelGeld

compact premiere Mai 2012 – Volksentscheid gegen den EURO-Wahn mit Referent Karl Albrecht Schachtschneider.

Die aktuelle Ausgabe von COMPACT-Magazin (5/2012) hat den Schwerpunkt “Das neue Geld – Was nach dem Euro kommt”. Passend dazu referierte Prof. K.A. Schachtschneider auf unserer Premierenveranstaltung – der Euro-Kritiker der ersten Stunde, das demokratische Urgestein sprach zum Thema Volkssouveränität und drohende Euro-Diktatur.

Jürgen Elsässer | compact Magazin

Am 5. Mai ging eine Meldung durch die alternativen Medien, George W. Bush und seine Anhängerschaft sei von einem malaysischen Gericht als Kriegsverbrecher verurteilt worden. Diese Nachricht las man in der gesamten Blogger-Sphäre, bei Kopp Online und in Onlineausgaben einiger Zeitungen.

Die Meldungen enthielten jeweils keine Primärquelle und keinen Link zu dem angeblichen Gericht. An dieser Stelle Asche auf das Haupt der Blogger, die nichts anderes tun als gegenseitig Copy und Paste zu betreiben.

Tatsächlich ist das KLFCW eine NGO, die zur Kriminalisierung von Kriegshandlungen gegründet wurde. Es dürfte sich also nicht um ein staatliches Gericht handeln:

About the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War (KLFCW)
Malaysia’s fourth Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad founded the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War (KLFCW), a non-governmental organisation established under the laws of Malaysia on 12 March 2007.

Primärquellen zum Artikel:

• 11.05.2012 | PRESS RELEASE: Bush and Associates Found Guilty of Torture
• 09.05.2012 | PRESS RELEASE: Bush and Associates Authorised Torture
• 05.05.2012 | TRIBUNAL TO HEAR SECOND WAR CRIME CHARGE AGAINST BUSH AND ASSOCIATES

Und hier dennoch die ganze Meldung:

KUALA LUMPUR, 11 May 2012 – The five-panel tribunal unanimously delivered a guilty verdict against former United States President George W. Bush and his associates at the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal hearing that had started on Monday.

On the charge of Crime of Torture and War Crimes, the tribunal finds the accused persons former U.S. President George W. Bush and his associates namely Richard Cheney, former U.S. Vice President, Donald Rumsfeld, former Defence Secretary, Alberto Gonzales, then Counsel to President Bush, David Addington, then General Counsel to the Vice-President, William Haynes II, then General Counsel to Secretary of Defence, Jay Bybee, then Assistant Attorney General, and John Choon Yoo, former Deputy Assistant Attorney-General guilty as charged and convicted as war criminals for Torture and Cruel, Inhumane and Degrading Treatment of the Complainant War Crime Victims.

Earlier in the week, the tribunal heard the testimonies of three witnesses namely Abbas Abid, Moazzam Begg and Jameelah Hameedi. They related the horrific tortures they had faced during their incarceration. The tribunal also heard two other Statutory Declarations of Iraqi citizen Ali Shalal and Rhuhel Ahmed, a British citizen.

Testimony showed that Abbas Abid, a 48-year-old chief engineer in the Science and Technology Ministry had his fingernails removed by pliers. Ali Shalal was attached with bare electrical wires and electrocuted and hung from the wall. Moazzam Begg was beaten and put in solitary confinement. Jameelah was almost nude and humiliated, used as a human shield whilst being transported by helicopter. All these witnesses have residual injuries till today.

These witnesses were taken prisoners and held in prisons in Afghanistan (Bagram), in Iraq (Abu Gharib, Baghdad International Airport) and two of them namely Moazzam Begg and Rhuhel Ahmed were transported to Guantanamo Bay.

In a submission that lasted a day, the prosecution showed in an in depth submission how the decision-makers at the highest level President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld, aided and abetted by the lawyers and the other commanders and CIA officials – all acted in concert. Torture was systematically applied and became an accepted norm.

According to the prosecution, the testimony of all the witnesses shows a sustained perpetration of brutal, barbaric, cruel and dehumanizing course of conduct against them. These acts of crimes were applied cumulatively to inflict the worst possible pain and suffering.

After hearing the defence of the Amicus Curiae and the subsequent rebuttal the prosecution, the tribunal ruled unanimously that there was a prima facie case made out by the prosecution.

After hours of deliberation, the tribunal, in the verdict that was read out by the president of the tribunal Tan Sri Dato Lamin bin Haji Mohd Yunus Lamin, found that the prosecution had established beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused persons, former President George Bush and his co-conspirators engaged in a web of instructions, memos, directives, legal advice and action that established a common plan and purpose, joint enterprise and/or conspiracy to commit the crimes of Torture and War Crimes, including and not limited to a common plan and purpose to commit the following crimes in relation to the “War on Terror” and the wars launched by the U.S. and others in Afghanistan and Iraq:

(a) Torture;
(b) Creating, authorizing and implementing a regime of Cruel, Inhumane, and
Degrading Treatment;
(c) Violating Customary International Law;
(d) Violating the Convention Against Torture 1984;
(e) Violating the Geneva Convention III and IV 1949;
(f) Violating the Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention of 1949.
(g) Violating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Charter.

The Tribunal finds that the prosecution has established beyond a reasonable doubt that the Accused persons are individually and jointly liable for all crimes committed in pursuit of their common plan and purpose under principles established by Article 6 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal (the Nuremberg Charter), which states, inter alia, “Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit war crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any person in execution of such plan.”

The Principles of the Nuremberg Charter and the Nuremberg Decision have been adopted as customary international law by the United Nations. The government of the United States is subject to customary international law and to the Principles of the Nuremburg Charter and the Nuremburg Decision.

The Tribunal finds that the prosecution has proven beyond reasonable doubt that the accused lawyers, gave ‘advice’ that “the Geneva Conventions did not apply (to suspected al Qaeda and Taliban detainees); that there was no torture occurring within the meaning of the Torture Convention, and that enhanced interrogations techniques, (constituting cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment,) were permissible.”

The prosecution has also established beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused lawyers “knew full well their advice was being sought to be acted upon, and in fact was acted upon, and such advice paved the way for violations of international law, the Geneva Conventions and the Torture Convention.”

The accused lawyers’ advice was binding on the accused Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney, each of whom relied on the accused lawyers’ advice. Others, such as CIA Director George Tenet and Diane Beaver, officer in charge at Guantanamo, relied on the accused lawyers’ advice. The prosecution had established beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused lawyers are criminally liable for their acts, and for participating in a joint criminal enterprise.

The president read that the Tribunal orders that reparations commensurate with the irreparable harm and injury, pain and suffering undergone by the Complainant War Crime Victims be paid to the Complainant War Crime Victims. While it is constantly mindful of its stature as merely a tribunal of conscience with no real power of enforcement, the Tribunal finds that the witnesses in this case are entitled ex justitia to the payment of reparations by the 8 convicted persons and their government.

It is the Tribunal’s hope that armed with the findings of this Tribunal, the witnesses will, in the near future, find a state or an international judicial entity able and willing to exercise jurisdiction and to enforce the verdict of this Tribunal against the 8 convicted persons and their government. The Tribunal’s award of reparations shall be submitted to the War Crimes Commission to facilitate the determination and collection of reparations by the Complainant War Crime Victims.

President Lamin read, “As a tribunal of conscience, the Tribunal is fully aware that its verdict is merely declaratory in nature. The tribunal has no power of enforcement, no power to impose any custodial sentence on any one or more of the 8 convicted persons. What we can do, under Article 31 of Chapter VI of Part 2 of the Charter is to recommend to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission to submit this finding of conviction by the Tribunal, together with a record of these proceedings, to the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, as well as the United Nations and the Security Council.

The Tribunal also recommends to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission that the names of all the 8 convicted persons be entered and included in the Commission’s Register of War Criminals and be publicized accordingly.

The Tribunal recommends to the War Crimes Commission to give the widest international publicity to this conviction and grant of reparations, as these are universal crimes for which there is a responsibility upon nations to institute prosecutions if any of these Accused persons may enter their jurisdictions.

ends

For further information, please contact

Dato’ Dr Yaacob Merican
Secretary General of the KLWCC Secretariat
Tel: +6012-227 8680

Ms Malkeet Kaur
Media Representative of KLWCC
malkeet@dbook.com.my
Tel: +6012-3737 886

The Tribunal Members

Tan Sri Dato Lamin bin Haji Mohd Yunus,
Mr Alfred Lambremont Webre
Tunku Sofiah Jewa
Prof Salleh Buang
Mr Alfred Lambremont Webre
Datuk Mohd Sa’ari Yusof.

The Prosecution

Prof Gurdial S Nijar
Prof Francis Boyle
Mr Avtaran Singh
Ms Gan Pei Fern

Amicus Curiae (appointed Defence team)

Mr Jason Kay
Dr Mohd Hisham
Dr Abbas Hardani
Ms Galoh Nursafinas

The Charge

Crime of Torture and War Crimes against former U.S. President George W. Bush and his associates namely Richard Cheney, former U.S. Vice President, Donald Rumsfeld, former Defence Secretary, Alberto Gonzales, then Counsel to President Bush, David Addington, then General Counsel to the Vice-President, William Haynes II, then General Counsel to Secretary of Defense, Jay Bybee, then Assistant Attorney General, and John Choon Yoo, former Deputy Assistant Attorney-General.

The Tribunal will adjudicate and evaluate the evidence presented on facts and law as in any court of law. The judges of the Tribunal must be satisfied that the charge is proven beyond reasonable doubt and deliver a reasoned judgement. The verdict and the names of the persons found guilty will be entered in the Commission’s Register of War Criminals and publicised worldwide.

About Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission (KLWCC)

The KLFCW established the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission (The Commission), to investigate cases of war crimes that have been neglected by established institutions such as the International Criminal Court. The Commission seeks to influence world opinion on the illegality of wars and occupation undertaken by major Western powers.

The aim of The Commission is thereby to hold perpetrators of war crimes accountable for their actions especially when relevant international judicial organs fail to do so.

The Commission
The commission’s function is to:
i) receive complaints from any victim(s) of any conflict on:

(a) Crimes against peace
(b) Crimes against humanity
(c) Crimes of genocide
(d) War crimes

ii) investigate the same and prepare a report of its findings. To further call for more evidence or where The Commission is satisfied to recommend prosecution

The Legal Team

The legal team’s aim is to present the complaints of victim(s) of any conflict and to act on the recommendation of The Commission’s report and to frame charges and prosecute accused person(s).

The Tribunal

The Tribunal shall adjudicate on the charges filed against the accused person(s) The applicable standard of proof shall be beyond reasonable doubt.

About the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War (KLFCW)

Malaysia’s fourth Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad founded the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War (KLFCW), a non-governmental organisation established under the laws of Malaysia on 12 March 2007.

The main objectives of the Foundation, as stated in its Statutes are, inter alia:

1. To undertake all necessary measures and initiatives to criminalise war and energise peace;

2. To provide relief, assistance and support to individuals and communities who are suffering from the effects of war and armed conflict wherever occurring and without discrimination on the grounds of nationality, racial origin, religion, belief, age, gender or other forms of impermissible differentiations;

3. To promote the education of individuals and communities suffering from the effects of war or armed conflict;

4. To foster schemes for the relief of human suffering occasioned by war or armed conflict;

5. To provide for mechanisms or procedures in attainment of the above purposes.

“WHY is it that the murder of one man is considered a criminal act whereas the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocent people committed in wars, is not considered so?
-Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad

—

Hier sieht man, dass die U.S. an sich selbst kläglich untergehen werden. Danke an die Macher des Films.

They can move together in swarms, build towers, dance, throw and catch, assess targets and soon will even make their own decisions. Both in war and at home, drones are developing fast and gaining control.

The screens at a US air force base lock onto a civilian car driving along a road in New Mexico. “We don’t simulate or actually engage them, it is just training to follow a moving target.” The question, “with their permission?” is met with an embarrassed pause and the faltering reply, “we’re just following them with a camera”. Rapidly becoming acceptable practice, increasingly police are also using drones to survey civilian areas for criminals. The US air force are now training more ‘desk pilots’ than traditional pilots, raising concerns that war is becoming “just a big computer game”, allowing pilots to kill a few Taliban fighters and then go home for dinner. Nathan Wessler, a civil rights lawyer, strongly argues that the US using drones to kill targets in countries like Yemen despite not being in a state of war with them could lead to serious repercussions. “It is really a dangerous precedent. The technology of drones is not that complicated and there are dozens of nations developing it.” And these robots are advancing. Future drones will be able to independently find targets and decide to attack. As Iran lays its hands on a US spy drone, which experts in this report argue they are “perfectly capable of copying”, has an uncontrolled new arms race already begun?

April 2012

Jourmeyman Pictures | Webseite | Youtube | Facebook | Twitter

Anfang der 90er Jahre, nach dem Zerfall der Sowjetunion, machte man sich in Washington Gedanken darüber, wie man die gewonnene Vormachtstellung der USA über das nächste Jahrhundert sichern könnte. In Denkfabriken entwarf man verschiedene geostrategische Szenarien, um die weltweite Kontrolle über die Rohstoffversorgung zu erlangen.

Der neue NuoViso Film “Kriegsversprechen II” wirft einen Blick auf die Planspiele amerikanischer Denkfabriken Anfang der 90er Jahre und stellt erschreckende Paralellen zur Gegenwart fest. Was in den Dokumenten des “Projects for the New American Century” schriftlich niedergedacht wurde, ließt sich wie ein Drehbuch für die darauffolgende Geschichtsschreibung. Völkerrechtswidrige Angriffskriege auf Jugoslawien, Afghanistan, Irak und Libyen waren die Folge. Und für Syrien und den Iran plant man derzeit auch großangelegte Militärinterventionen.

Bitte unterstützen Sie die Arbeit von NuoViso Filmproduktion mit dem Kauf der DVD im NuoViso Shop.

Wenn Du denkst Du musst am Ziel ankommen, dann denk nicht weiter nach. – Vielleicht bist Du schon angekommen.

3Sat — Ein Film von Ein Film von Einar Matre und Monica Oien (2010) – Der 700 km lange Pfad von den Pyrenäen bis nach Santiago de Compostela, der letzte Abschnitt des sogenannten Jakobswegs, galt im Mittelalter neben den Wallfahrten nach Rom und Jerusalem als wichtigster Pilgerweg. Paulo Coelho führt uns selbst den Jakobsweg entlang und erzählt über seine Philosophie, seine Erlebnisse am Jakobsweg und warum so viele Menschen diesen Pilgerweg gehen.

Paolo Coelho spürte auf diesem Pfad die Energie von Tausenden Pilgern, die bereits vor ihm da waren, und erahnt genauso die kommenden. Er philosophiert über seine Fehler, Schwächen und Hürden in seinem Leben, die ihn oft verzweifeln ließen. Auf seiner Pilgerschaft hat er sich mit ihnen konfrontiert und sich immer besser selbst kennengelernt und erfahren, “dass der Weg der Erkenntnis allen Menschen offensteht und bei den einfachen Dingen beginnt.” Sie sind die Basis für das Zusammenleben aller Menschen. Beziehung ist die Basis unseres Seins. Am Jakobsweg begegnet man vielen Menschen. Durch die physische Anstrengung fällt alles Überflüssige weg und das Authentische eines jeden Einzelnen tritt ans Licht.